JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 29, 2015

A- de 2015

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice María Victoria Calle Correa

✓Claimant Jose Humberto Salazar Barrios·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Negar por cuanto no se incurrió en ninguna de las causales invocadas
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de nulidad de sentencia.

El peticionario presentó varios argumentos como causales de nulidad.

Estos son: modificación de jurisprudencia, incongruencia entre la parte motiva y la parte resolutiva de la decisión y error de hecho por falso juicio de identidad en la apreciación de las pruebas.

Luego de analizar cada uno de los cargos planteados, la Corte decide NEGAR la solicitud de nulidad presentada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. NEGAR la solicitud de nulidad de la sentencia T-720 de 2014, proferida por la Sala Primera de Revision de la Corte Constitucional.
  2. Segundo. Comunicar la presente providencia al peticionario, informandole que contra ella no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.